Skip to main content

A Warning about Models

Due to the complexity of sustainability and social responsibility, we use a lot of models. One of the key lessons learned though is that “colouring by numbers does not guarantee success”. It is important to realize the limitations and constraints of models, and the fact that they should always be re-evaluated, particularly when new information comes to light. This is important for all of us no matter what side of the debates we are on.

How Reliable are Models?

As a “methodologist”, one of my favourite phrases is “all models are wrong… some models are useful,” by George Box, an industrial statistician.

 

Why do we use Models?

Some people like prose, some like models, some like other things to describe and understand things. I like models personally. As Jay Forrester points out below, we organize our understanding of the universe in models to help us understand and interact with the real system or real world.

 

 

How should we Continuously Evaluate Models?

However, using the scientific method, we must continuously re-evaluate and test our models.

 

 

From the ‘Institute & Faculty of Actuaries’ I appreciate the following lesson learned for dealing with models (and methods) in the real world:

Al models are deliberate simplifications of the real world. Attempts to demonstrate a model’s correctness can be expected to fail, or apparently to succeed because of test limitations, such as insufficient data…

When a model fails, a variety of narratives may be offered to describe what went wrong. There may be disagreements between experts about the causes of any crisis, depending on who knew, or could have known, about model limitations. Possible elements include:

  • A new risk emerged from nowhere and there is nothing anyone could have done to anticipate it – sometimes called a “black swan”.
  • The models had unknown weaknesses, which could have been revealed by more thorough testing.
  • Model users were well acquainted with model weaknesses, but these were not communicated to senior management accountable for the business
  • Everyone knew about the model weaknesses but they continued to take excessive risks regardless. (Maggid, 2017)

CONCLUSION

The lesson learned out of this is to not believe completely in models, but to continuously test them out. They aid in communication, awareness and understanding, but they may not provide a complete picture of the real world and all of the possible permutations.

 

REFERENCES

Maggid, Joshua. (April 16, 2017). All Models are Wrong. Actuary Info. http://actuary-info.blogspot.com/2017/04/all-models-are-wrong.html

Shares

Peter Milsom

Peter Milsom is an entrepreneurial advocate for sensible, sustainable change delivery practice. Peter has come to realize that sustainability is the perfect catalyst for Project / Programme / Portfolio / Risk / Value / Business Case and Benefits Management improvement. As an entrepreneurial methodologist Peter's unique value proposition is the vast array of tools and techniques that he brings to every engagement using the most cost effective and efficient methods based on the situation and tailored to meet your needs. This is based on his unique combination of experience and extensive training / certifications in change delivery, value / risk / benefits management business case, and business architecture.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Follow

Get the latest posts delivered to your mailbox:

Shares

Subscribe to our Blog!

Do you like our blog? Get notified when we publish new content!

It only takes a moment and you will get our blog delivered right to you!  the X and add your email address in the upper right-hand corner.  That is all it takes!




Clef two-factor authentication
%d bloggers like this: